Usability Testing and Heuristic Evaluation Essay

Usability Testing and Heuristic Evaluation - screen ExampleUsability Testing and Heuristic EvaluationLearnability affects how fast a hirer can learn and use the agreement after undergoing a certain amount and duration of training. Efficiency affects the amount of tasks a exploiter can perform in a set amount of time. Meanwhile, memorability enables a exploiter to use the administration after a period of inactivity without having to relearn its operation. Low error rate refers to the number of problems encountered by the user and the ease of correcting such errors. Lastly, satisfaction generally refers to the overall user perception of the system overhaul its intended purpose. Usability Testing The term usability streamleting has been generally referred to as any method used to appraise a system or result. For the purpose of clarification, the term usability testing shall be used in this root as a distinct empirical method of system evaluation with the goal of identifying u sability issues and developing testimonial on how address such issues. Rubin and Chisnell described usability testing as a process of recruiting people as test participants to evaluate the system based on a series of usability guidelines. Test participants are normally composed of individuals whose profiles represent the target user reference. The inclusion of test participants based on real adult male parameters is what makes usability testing unique among other usability assessment methods. In this method, test participants are selected from the target user audience and are asked to perform specific tasks using a prototype of the system. During the duration of the test, user performance and reactions to the product are observed and recorded by a facilitator (Fiset, 2009). In essence, usability testing is a research cats-paw which originated from conventional observational methodology. The range of usability tests that can be performed is significantly broad, allowing the deve loper to tailor-fit approaches according to the test objectives, time constraints, and resources uncommitted (Rubin & Chisnell, 2008). Since it originated from conventional approaches for controlled experiments, usability testing follows formal methods which include (1) hypothesis formulation (2) random sampling of participants (3) utilization of experimental controls (4) utilization of controlled groups and (4) composition of sample size to determine statistical differences between groups (Rubin & Chisnell, 2008). Fiset (2009) outlined the following canonical steps in conducting usability assessments (1) definition of test objectives (2) enumeration of tasks (3) developing a prototype or simulate of the system (4) performing a preliminary validation test on prototype (5) recruiting test participants (6) preparing forms, venue, and equipment (7) determine level of confidentiality of acquired data (8) conducting the test proper (9) filling out of evaluation questionnaire (10) anal ysis and consolidation of results (11) create verbally down of recommendations. The objectives of the usability test are normally determined by the phase of system development the test will be carried out. Initial usability tests usually involve performing specific tasks based on the system design. As development progresses, additional objectives may be added such as identification of number errors, gauging user satisfaction, measuring time spent completing a